Whither Leadership qualities among Sri Lanka Politicians
By A. Rajasingam
Leadership is one of the most salient aspects of the organizational context whether it is politics or business. Leadership is difficult to define but it can be described as facing the challenges by demonstrating various qualities accepted by civilized societies.
The Bhagavad Gita while providing means and ways of leading people, emphasizes that leadership qualities focuses on motivation, meaningful decisions and framing plans thereto, firmness in the achievement of goal, excellence in work, controlling of emotions, etc., for all of which mind should be clear. This philosophy is applied not only to the concept of modern management, but also to freedom fighters leading a liberation struggle. This was seen when George Washington, Jawaharalal Nehru, Mahatma Gandhi and others organized and led their people in obtaining freedom. They have not massacred innocent men, women and children for political ends and even did not had torturing camps.

[Pic: courtesy of sundaytimes.lk]
Had there been an inborn leadership qualities among the Sri Lankan political leaders at or before the independence, such political leaders could have avoided the present conflict between the Sinhala-dominated government and the Tamil people, in spite of the imperfect amalgamation of the Tamil nation and the Sinhala nation under a Unitary rule by the British. Making statements such as “if they want a war, let there be a war” by a President, releasing of a prisoner (Naval rating) immediately after assuming the office of Presidency, protesting vehemently on the streets over the signing of the Indo-Sri Lanka Peace Accord and the presence of the IPKF and thereafter going after India, failure to tender an apology for violation of human rights, appointing convicted criminals as Parliamentarians which are a liability and costly affair, maintenance of a mega Cabinet, reluctant to resign on matters of corruption and malpractices by Ministers over National issues followed by a decision of the Supreme Court, conflict between the judiciary and the Executive President and Parliament etc., are matters that raise a question mark on leadership qualities among the Sri Lankan politicians. Similarly leaders leading a liberation struggle engaged in murders, abductions, having torture camps, illegal transactions, conscription by both parties, etc., also do not justify the leadership qualities.
Furthermore, leadership qualities implies sincerity, responsibility, steadiness and discouragement of corruption. The selfish motive of politicians allow room for undue influence for the terrorists to achieve their mission. Had there been selfless motive among the Sri Lankan politicians, the assassinations of A.Amirthalingam V.Yogeswaran, Dr.Neelan Thiruchelvam and Laxman Kadirgamar would not have taken place. If there is a selfish motive, the presence of the element of threat cannot be wiped out from the leadership quality. The leadership quality discouraged the element of threat in the minds of the peace loving people. Greed for Power should not affect the life of ordinary citizens.
Bhagavad Gita stressed the importance of democratic methods even when combating the evils. Every religion like the Bhagavad Gita stresses that the improvement of the basic thinking of humans will automatically enhance the quality of their actions which can be seen in federalism. At this juncture, mention should be made that leadership qualities are found in every sector (be it Health, Social, Police, Transport, etc) for which Canadians are really proud of, while in Sri Lanka the people are deprived of such benefits enjoyed by the Canadians resulting from such leadership qualities. Instead several hundred thousands of lives of innocent people in the current ethnic problem as well as during the time of JVP insurrections were lost due the lack of leadership qualities in Sri Lanka.
Sri Lankan political leaders has yet to improve their leadership qualities as gar as politics is concerned and realize that Federalism is not separation. Federalism is not the discovery of communal leaders but by eminent persons with leadership qualities who visualized that Federal Government as a Guide to the Provincial Governments which later became a reality. Federalism is a concept that emerged with the independence of the United States of America. The struggle for Parliamentary supremacy was seen during the Stuart period in England and the achievement of the Glorious Revolution in 1688 was due to the able leadership qualities of the political leaders. Similarly in France the works of Mondesque, Rousseau and Voltaire were instrumental for the quest for civil liberties which called for wider participation. The French Revolution marked the beginning of the continuation of democracy, though the foundation for the birth of democracy took place in Greece.
After 1848 Europe saw the beginning of the downfall of Monarch regime and the rise of Republics in general after the First World War. But it is in America, the first federal constitution was realized with the Philadelphia Convention in 1787. It was a successful arrangement between the thirteen colonies which allowed for the spread of representative government based on unity in diversity. Another notable achievement of leadership quality was seen when President Abraham Lincoln won the struggle for the underprivileged class. Thereafter number of countries with large territories and small countries with various races speaking and practicing different languages, and faiths adopted this federal arrangement to meet the legitimate aspirations of the people without any discriminations whatsoever. Such federal arrangements became successful mainly because of the leadership qualities found in their leaders. It is the leadership qualities of the rulers which accounted for the achievement of such a federal arrangement resulting in a remarkable economic development and avoidance of conflicts among citizens.
In Sri Lanka politicians are surviving on the existing divisions of the people in relation to the language, religion and cultures. They do not want to come for a happy compromise for a union of Provinces where the Representatives of the Provinces would be given prominence in matters relating to the economic development of their respective Provinces. This could be seen for the last sixty years ranging several Pacts to the present APRC and still breaking their heads over devolution of power to the periphery. Merely making statements that Sri Lanka is proud to be the successors of a 2500 year old Buddhist civilization is not sufficient, but should have the courage and determination to adjust a federal arrangement to changing conditions. Even Britain, being a Unitary country with an unwritten constitution, passed devolution of powers to Scotland, Wales and Ireland by way of Acts of Parliament, which in fact was a federal arrangement. The failure to arrive at a meaningful conclusion points out that the Sinhalese politicians lack the leadership qualities. This applies even to leaders leading a liberation struggle when they resort to illegal methods especially violating the laws of other countries.
Politicians failed to realize that the money spent on this meaningless war could have been easily utilized for the development of the entire country with wider participation of the people through Federalism, which has the force of cultivating leadership qualities. Had there been a proper wider participation in the country, Sri Lanka would have been flooded with housemaids and labourers from other countries for development projects. It is a pity to see that that housemaids and labourers, risking their lives, leave for Middle East countries on account of the denial of wider participation by the politicians, all of which call for cultivating leadership qualities of the politicians. The strong motivation among the politicians to build a strong economic Sri Lanka is lacking. Perhaps the politicians wanted this war for their survival to conceal their malpractices which are detrimental to the country.
Further, the leadership qualities can be observed during negotiations. When negotiating for peace, the leader and/or his team should be well versed with the vital issues and the suitable remedies for the unsettled problems, international relations, law, economics, etc. Mention should be made that when the armed conflict between the Sinhala-dominated government and the Tamil people was due to an "imperfect" de-colonization process by the British, the LTTE failed miserably in not pointing out the initial remedy of federalism to the ethnic problem and that the forced marriage of unitary rule had become a futile exercise. Since the LTTE team was inexperienced, it should have got round the Negotiator for a Federal solution so that the Negotiator could have demonstrated his skill to place the ball in Dr.Palitha Kohona's court. Such a technique required for negotiation, calls for leadership qualities. One cannot expect leadership qualities from gun tottering cadres. However, on the Sri Lankan side Dr.G.L.Peiris had shown his skill to give room for accommodation to begin with a confident building measure. Love and compassion (respect for each other) should have been exhibited at the negotiating table.
Had Dr.Neelan Thiruchelvam and A.Amirthalingam been alive, the negotiation would have seen a meaningful outcome with the passage of time which would have drawn the attention of the international community. Negotiation is an art and involves technique. Negotiation helps to build a confident building measure. Even the Palestinian leader Yaseer Arafat and the Israeli leader were brought together at the Camp David Accord which laid the foundation of limited self-rule to Palestinians (itself a symbol of confident building measure) on account of the masterly skills demonstrated by Bill Clinton. History has reminded that the lack of leadership qualities would ultimately pay for heavy loss of lives and destruction of properties.
Terrorism is a 21st century phenomenon. There are differences between the freedom fighter and the terrorist. Piracy, subversive, torture, murder, robbery are all part of terrorism. Though terrorism is carried out on various levels, it deprives a man of his civil liberties. Briefly the element of 'threat to life' would be present in the concept of terrorism, though such act may be in pursuit of political end. As Human Rights is recognized throughout the world by civilized Nations, the need for terrorist acts by leaders carrying on a freedom struggle is not required. A compromise between the oppressed party and the ruling party with the assistance of a moderate State would be more promising. But the trend today is the ruling majority party is reluctant to recognize the right of self-determination of the oppressed community in Sri Lanka. The inevitable thing that cannot be digested by civilized Nations is that innocent Tamils are being abducted and shot not only by Security Forces but also by paramilitary groups when finding difficult to gain support, without realizing the plight of the innocent Tamils. The conduct of the paramilitary groups towards the innocent Tamils reminds of the dogs which cannot straightened their tails forever. Hence the uprising of the aggrieved community leading to bloody battle cannot be ruled out. The root cause for such conflicts is the lack of leadership qualities on both sides.
2 Comments
I agree for the most part the characterization of SL government today. Then shadowy brothers of president were not known to many people during the election. They all with the thugs like Mervyn Silva and wasteful people like Boollagama who continued to exorbitantly spend tax payers’ money are unfortunate and not the type of politicos many people envisioned in the present government. As a democracy the public demands, transparency, fairness in all aspects including expenditure, civil liberties and freedom of speech have not been greatest in SL.
But, the present government came into power when a ruthless terrorist outfit continues to savage the normal life of all citizens. The mentioned famous names in Mr. A. Rajasingam’s article belonged to well educated people including Yasser Arafat who was an engineer, a profession, can be selected by those who have a higher analytical and mathematical skills as a student during those days and somebody earned a Nobel prize for peace. It is a farce even to mention Prabakaran along with the great leaders like George Washington, Nehru or Gandhi. These great leaders did not start their movements killing their own people and terrorizing the civilians with guns. After seeing how and what LTTE has done in the Vanni, have Prabakaran given any authority to govern, one cannot expect anything more than a regime of another Pol Pot. Prabakaran survived with all government welfare and support rendered through the people living in the Vanni and robbing them and putting the innocent civilians into extreme pressure for his existence. The crimes he has committed will no way let him be allowed to live as an ordinary human being and his life is limited with a gun attached to his belt.
The problem we are facing in Sri Lanka is historical. While I believe the terrorism is not a 21 century phenomenon as Mr. A. Rajasingam has stated, it is as old as human race. Only difference is how one defines it. It is a fact that the Sinhala is a language evolved through diachronic linguistics and spoken only by people living in Sri Lanka. If Sinhalese are alien invaders from another part of the world they should have a larger community living elsewhere. That is not the case and Sinhalese are a unique race originated from the original inhabitants and who came with Sanskrit roots to the island. The Sinhala language is derived from Sanskrit as Hindi and this is not to claim what so ever the Sinhalese are Aryans. The mixture of Tamils into Sinhala language is very limited showing that Sinhala is evolved without Tamil influence. I am not a historian to argue except to say what is visible in front of everyone to understand the Sinhala race and its uniqueness to Sri Lanka without any Tamil influence in the most part. Today, the Sinhala language has some spoken words that came from various invaders including the Portugese, Dutch, English and of course South Indians.
We must understand, this problem we face in Sri Lanka today has two sides. I remember up until early 70’s Tamil students were illegally entering then only two engineering, two medical and law colleges in the country of unprecedent proportions, depriving Sinhala students their chances to earn a degree legitimately. The so called educated Tamil elite who came from these engineering, medical and law colleges prior to early 70’s carried this guilt on their back. Until then SL government brought evidence and answer scripts written in Tamil to the parliament and shown, no action was taken in this regard. Finally, to stop the Tamil conspiracy of undergraduate college entrance, the SL government introduced district population based university admission. This reduced those who tried to enter illegally from one district while immensely helping rural districts like Amparai. There are different types of problems from both sides and that is not a secret.
Sri Lanka has gone through many roller coaster rides as a result of invaders from neighboring countries as well as by European imperialists. The Sinhalese race and Buddhism have existed through out the country from Nagadeepa islet in the North to Vanni caves to all southern parts until other foreign religions came and spread later in the island. But, today the respect for Hinduism and Buddhism is well preserved as both religions have many common values that to preserve the coexistence of humanity and the protection of the planet as a whole. This mindset is different from that of European invaders who killed local inhabitants and destroyed the land claiming everything is for the benefit of so called civilized monotheistic believers.
We, Sri Lankans living in the island should understand the realities of today and try to find a common ground to bring peace among all of us. Mr. A.Amirthalingam, Mr. V.Yogeswaran, Dr.Neelan Thiruchelvam and Mr. Laxman Kadirgamar are a few of the famous Tamil politicians and elite, some lived little longer than the others but all unfortunately faced the same fate by the LTTE. For a determined suicide killer no target is impossible and Mr. Kadiragamr was the last among those four to fell for a sniper bullet inside his own backyard. It is our memory in the early years of LTTE that Mr. A.Amirthalingam, Mr. V.Yogeswaran, and Dr.Neelan Thiruchelvam all supported LTTE and later changed their minds. Once, they were a thorn in the SL majority populace when they were jumping from Jaffna to Colombo to Tamil Nadu to Delhi and to European cities and nobody knew the messages they carried from whom and to who. I cannot imagine what type of leaders they were to support a terrorist outfit that finally ended their own lives with a bullet in to the head by the killers that once they supported. Many other so called Tamil leaders those who came with a gun never had luxury to live even that long and died young with a bullet in to the head by the LTTE. But, others like Mr. Douglas Devanande lived today only because of his commitment to real peace and SL government’s genuine desire to protect all peace loving citizens and leaders like him.
Those who migrated to the West know that the discrimination is part of life. The unjust police brutality is visible only when you face it no matter who you are. The political corruption has no color, race, religion, region, or country rich or poor. The elected people once they come to power, the way they amass wealth show their greed and the misuse of power is shamefully. They know no principles what so ever to understand the people trusted and elected these politicos only to serve the people not themselves and their relatives. Only way the citizens can punish them is at the next election or by bringing them to courts once they lose power.
Any clever leadership coming to a bargaining table should know that bring unjust demands which are unrealistic and unachievable will be countered by more pronounced reasons by the other side with rejection. Clearly, the parties should understand the Sinhalese majority living in the country will not support division of the island. Also, India will never support a division in Sri Lanka as a precautionary measure in the light of internal politics and its own integrity. The arguments whether between husband and wife, domestic or international cannot be solved if one side sticks to its unjust demands neglecting all ground realities from the other side. It is not uncommon to ask for more as long as a party is ready to compromise and accept what is reasonable to all at the bargaining table. The teachings of Bhagavad Geeta did not bring peace to resolve conflicts without bitter wars among India-West Pakistan, India-East-Pakistan, India-China, and even today between India-Kashmir and India-Pakistan. The struggles among Indian states, whether racial, religious, tribal, among castes exist even today because the parties do not want to give an inch from their demands for a realistic and just solution for all. It is time for us, Sri Lankans to understand this reality and find a compromise and articulate that clearly to the masses to stop this war.
It is heart braking to see the pictures of Tamil children, elderly, families, young and old brave bullets and walk a greater distance barefoot through mine infested jungles to reach government held areas with what ever little they could carry from the Vanni. These are the innocents as anybody else. Their faces and eyes tell the true stories of what they are going through. The little sons and daughters who should enjoy their childhood, young sons and daughters who should attend schools, brothers and sisters who should work and look for a better life and the parents who have responsibility to protect families and elderly are all come to the liberated areas without knowing when the peace and normal life will come back to them. What crime did these children and adults have committed to wander like this and to face such an unpredictable future away from their homes and livelihoods. It is a great sadness to see a dead body of whether it is Sinhala, Tamil, Muslim or any other Sri Lankan or foreigner in the battlefront or at other bombings since these are precious lives wasted for something we should have united to solve not as Tamils, Jaffna Tamils, eastern Tamils, upcountry Tamils, Muslims or Sinhalese but as Sri Lankans. True Sri Lankans are no traitors to the country. True Sri Lankans should treat each other with respect without any racial or religious indifference. We have argued and can continue to argue to find who is right and who is wrong, but there will not be any ending in such an exercise. The answer lies in arrival at a compromise that’s fair to all. Let us come to terms with realities from all sides and solve this problem for the sake of our children and in the name of our beloved country Sri Lanka.
Dr. Monika Dias, PhD
What a distortion of history and current affairs, Just propaganda and crocodile tears!!!